So, after some research, I found something called ScaleMail. You can just do a google search for it and buy it off of Etsy or Amazon. It seems like pretty quality stuff. I'd love to see what you're gonna make with it!
Incurring actual indirect factory wages in excess of budgeted amounts for actual production results in a controllable variance. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of controllable variance?</h3>
Controllable variance can be referred to or considered as a variance that computes the difference between the actual quantity and the budgeted quantity sold or consumed by a firm in an economy. It can never be deficit, and is always in surplus of the budgeted amounts.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of controllable variance.
Learn more about controllable variance here:
brainly.com/question/13985361
#SPJ4
The question seems to be incomplete. It has been added below for better reference.
Incurring actual indirect factory wages in excess of budgeted amounts for actual production results in a:
a. quantity variance
b. controllable variance
c. volume variance
d. rate variance
Answer:
d. all of the choices
Explanation:
Cost of Goods sold = Cost of material purchased + Conversion cost
And
Conversion cost hereby includes Direct labor cost and other production overheads directly attributable to the Goods sold.
So, The correct option is - d. all of the choices
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
