Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The market should determine the price of goods and services only. The commercialization of human organs would increase the existing social inequality. This is because poor people would only be able to sell their organs, meaning they would not have the ability to buy a kidney if they needed it. On the other hand, it would increase the sale of kidneys for material survival itself, which is morally reprehensible.
Answer: C. grant Mary the legal rights for the property.
Explanation:
Agents are not to use the knowledge that their principal paid them to acquire or that they acquired for the use of their principal for themselves.
If Mary bought a property knowing that Karen wanted to buy that property, the Court will award the title to Karen because Mary has violated her duty not to use knowledge of information intended for her principal for her own benefit.
Answer:
(a) Barton's investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Accounts receivables $44,900
($48,000 - $3,100)
Equipment $90,000
Allowances for uncollectible $1,300
Barton Capital $133,600
(To record Barton's contribution)
(b) Fallows' investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Cash $28,700
Merchandise Inventory $60,500
Fallow Capital $89,200
(To record Fallow's contribution)
Did you ever find the answer?
Answer:
The annual rate of return of the invesment will be -14,97%
Explanation:
The initial investment is 45.000 and after 5 years the value of the investment is only 20.000. Here we can see a destruction of value (20.000 < 45.000). In finance, the time takes an essential part in calculation, so through the interest rate we calculated how bad was the investment in annual terms. The formula is as follows: Final investment value=(Initial investment*(1+interest rate)^(total years)) in our case would be: 20.000=(45.000*(1+interest rate)^(5)) From this formula we got -14,97%