Answer: trench foot
Explanation: It came from the wet conditions down in the trenches.
<span> B). Marbury v. Madison : that it had the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
</span><span>Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution.</span><span>
</span>
The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
I think it’s 12,000 - 15,000 but I’m not really sure .
1. lack of internal control
Take sex drive as example.
When one failed to hold the rushing hormone in blood veins,actions like over-intimated body touch or verbally harassments might occur.
To a more severe extent, illegally intercourse which against another's will might happen also.
2. lack of external control
Take gang war as example.
Despite the psychological reasons behind,
a group of bulk muscled men with some might carry weapons, tend to become an extremely tricky situation even just to start a tiny quarrel.
Without concerning laws and punishment afterwards, these violent movements shows the aftermath of ignoring society regulations.
