1000 meters make 1km. So let's compare that with the question.
1000m=1km
Y=33km
I represented the unknown with Y. Next, you have to cross and multiply. 33 will multiply 1,000 to give 33,000. And Y will multiply 1 to give Y. That will be;
Y=33,000m
33km makes 33,000m.
Hope that helped. Have a nice day
Answer with explanation:
Let us assume that the 2 functions are:
1) f(x)
2) g(x)
Now by definition of concave function we have the first derivative of the function should be strictly decreasing thus for the above 2 function we conclude that

Now the sum of the 2 functions is shown below

Diffrentiating both sides with respect to 'x' we get

Since each term in the right of the above equation is negative thus we conclude that their sum is also negative thus

Thus the sum of the 2 functions is also a concave function.
Part 2)
The product of the 2 functions is shown below

Diffrentiating both sides with respect to 'x' we get

Now we can see the sign of the terms on the right hand side depend on the signs of the function's themselves hence we remain inconclusive about the sign of the product as a whole. Thus the product can be concave or convex.
You haven’t provided any option, however I think I can still help.
You can solve 4(3-6). You first deal with he parenthesis, and get 4(-3). This means that your expression is equivalent to -12.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:the car was traveling at a speed of 80 ft/s when the brakes were first applied.
Step-by-step explanation:
The car braked with a constant deceleration of 16ft/s^2. This is a negative acceleration. Therefore,
a = - 16ft/s^2
While decelerating, the car produced skid marks measuring 200 feet before coming to a stop.
This means that it travelled a distance,
s = 200 feet
We want to determine how fast the car was traveling (in ft/s) when the brakes were first applied. This is the car's initial velocity, u.
Since the car came to a stop, its final velocity, v = 0
Applying Newton's equation of motion,
v^2 = u^2 + 2as
0 = u^2 - 2 × 16 × 200
u^2 = 6400
u = √6400
u = 80 ft/s
Answer:
1.5 is not a prime number
Step-by-step explanation: