Answer:
b. 5.27%
Explanation:
First, find the PV of the bond today. With a financial calculator, input the following and adjust the variables to semi-annual basis;
Face value; FV = 1000
Maturity of bond; N = 15*2 = 30
Semiannual coupon payment = (8.75%/2)*1000 = 43.75
Semi annual interest rate; I/Y = 3.25%
then compute Price; CPT PV= 1,213.547
Next, with the PV , compute the yield to call (I/Y) given 6 years;
Maturity of bond; N = 6*2 = 12
Semiannual coupon payment = (8.75%/2)*1000 = 43.75
Price; PV= -1,213.547
Face value; FV = 1,050
then compute Semiannual interest rate; CPT I/Y = 2.636%
Convert the semiannual rate to annual yield to call = 2.636*2 = 5.27%
What’s the Acronym? (A acronym is like LOL, or OMG)
Answer:
1. 780,000 pints
2. $1
3. $780,000
Explanation:
1. The computation of the equivalent units of production is shown below:
= Units completed and transferred out + completed units in ending inventory × completion percentage
= 700,000 pints + 200,000 pints × 40%
= 780,000 pints
2. The computation of the unit cost for January month is shown below:
= (Beginning Work in process + Costs added during January) ÷ equivalent units
= ($156,000 + $624,000) ÷ (780,000 pints)
= $1
3. The computation of the assigned units is shown below:
= Units completed and transferred out × unit cost + completed units in ending inventory × completion percentage × unit cost
= 700,000 pints × $1 + 200,000 pints × 40% ×$1
= $780,000
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>