Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x-intercepts exist where y is equal to 0. Where y is equal to 0 is where the graph goes through the x-axis. Our x-intercepts are (2x-3), (x + 3), and (x-4). Again, since x-intercepts exist where y = 0, then by the Zero Product Property, 2x - 3 = 0, x - 4 = 0, and x + 3 = 0. In the first x-intercept:
2x - 3 = 0 and
2x = 3 so
x = 3/2
In the second:
x - 4 = 0 so
x = 4
In the third:
x + 3 = 0 so
x = -3
So the x-intercepts in the correct order are x = 3/2, 4, -3
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Total number of tickets sold = 3388
Total number of coach tickets = 3069
Total number of first-class tickets = Total number of tickets sold - Total number of coach tickets
= 3388 - 3069
= 319

Ratio of the number of first-class tickets to the total number of tickets = 319:3388
Answer:
The price of today's bread is $7.
40% of $7 is $2.80.
The price of yesterdays bread is $7-$2.80.
7-2.80=4.20
The price of yesterday's bread is $4.20
Tobin has enough money to purchase a loaf of yesterday's bread.
Hope this helps!
It has been proven that of all line segments drawn from a given point not on it, the perpendicular line segment is the shortest.
<h3>How to prove a Line Segment?</h3>
We know that in a triangle if one angle is 90 degrees, then the other angles have to be acute.
Let us take a line l and from point P as shown in the attached file, that is, not on line l, draw two line segments PN and PM. Let PN be perpendicular to line l and PM is drawn at some other angle.
In ΔPNM, ∠N = 90°
∠P + ∠N + ∠M = 180° (Angle sum property of a triangle)
∠P + ∠M = 90°
Clearly, ∠M is an acute angle.
Thus; ∠M < ∠N
PN < PM (The side opposite to the smaller angle is smaller)
Similarly, by drawing different line segments from P to l, it can be proved that PN is smaller in comparison to all of them. Therefore, it can be observed that of all line segments drawn from a given point not on it, the perpendicular line segment is the shortest.
Read more about Line segment at; brainly.com/question/2437195
#SPJ1