The answer is "<span>Stimulus Discrimination".
“us” in the above question stands for </span><span>unconditioned stimulus. </span>Discrimination is a term
utilized as a part of both operant and classical conditioning. It includes the
capacity to recognize between one stimulus and similar stimuli. In the two
cases, it implies just reacting to specific stimuli yet not to those that are
similar.
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
Hi, You have not informed the problem that your question refers to, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
The only way to answer this question is to understand the problem it is pointing out. For this you must read the full question and identify this issue. Once this is done, you should search your memory for a time when this problem can be seen in your community. If your community has never seen this issue, you can comment on the community of someone you know, but you need to justify this in your response. When telling how the problem was established in the community, you should inform how this problem started, what are the consequences, if it is still in the community, if it was solved and how it was solved.
