Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
A = L * W
A = 320
L = W + 4
320 = W(W + 4)
320 = W^2 + 4W
W^2 + 4W = 320
W^2 + 4W + 4 = 320 + 4
(W + 2)^2 = 324
W + 2 = (+-) sqrt 324
W = -2 (+-) 18
W = -2 + 18 = 16 ft <== this is the width
W = -2 - 18 = -20....not this one because it is negative
L = W + 4
L = 16 + 4
L = 20 ft <=== this is the length
in summary...the width is 16 ft and the length is 20 ft
The answer is 31. 10+10+20+1=31
