Incomplete question. The full question read;
The producer of the news station posted an article about the high school’s football championship ceremony on a new website. The website had 500 views after four hours. Create a table to show how many views the website would have had after the first, second, and third hours after posting if the website receives views at the same rate. How many views would the website receive after 5 hours?
Answer:
<u>625 views</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> we are told to <u>base our calculation on the assumption that the website receives views at the same rate.</u>
Hence, if after 4 hours there were 500 views, it means the average views per hour would be 500/4 = 125 views. So for every hour, there would be 125 added views to the total.
In other words,
First hour: <u>125 views</u>
Second hour:<u> </u><u>250 views (125 views + 125 views</u>)
Third hour: <u>375 views (250 views + 125 views)</u>
Fourth hour: <u>500 views (375 views + 125 views)</u>
Fifth hour:<u> 625 views (500 views + 125 views)</u>
Use this formula...
(-4 + 8) / 2 , (8 + (-4)) / 2
From there you get...
4 / 2 , 4 / 2
Simplify and you get
(2 , 2)
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
6x + 6(-x) = - 2
6x - 6x = - 2
the answer was not relevant than 0
i am a mathematics teacher. if anything to ask please pm me