Answer:
The correct answer is: simple squamous epithelium.
Explanation:
The epithelium is one of the four basic tissues found in the body, along with the connective tissue, the muscle tissue, and the nervous tissue.
Epithelial tissue is commonly found surrounding surfaces such as the skin, and also making up the inner lining of hollow organs such as the ones that form the gastrointestinal tract.
<u>The number of layers and the shape of the cells in the epithelium have a direct correlation in the function of the tissue.</u> Functions can vary a lot from organ to organ, from absorption to protection and everything in between.
<u>A</u><u> simple squamous epithelium</u><u> is composed of a single layer of flat cells, which makes it permeable to liquids and small molecules, an important feature in organs where filtration or diffusion is needed; for example: capillaries and alveoli</u>.
Xylem transports water and minerals from the roots to the leaves of the plant, where it is used in the production of food.
Answer:
Explanation:
Normally, under anaerobic condition in yeast, pyruvate produced from glycolysis leads to the production of ethanol as shown below.
pyruvate ⇒ acetaldehyde + NADH ⇒ ethanol + NAD
The pyruvate is converted to acetaldehyde by the enzyme, pyruvate decarboxylase. It should be NOTED that carbon dioxide is released in this step. The acetaldehyde produced in the "first step" is then converted to ethanol by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase. It must be noted from the above that the steps are irreversible.
If a mutated strain of yeast is unique because it does not produce alcohol and lactic acid (which is referred to as toxic acid in the question); thus having a high level of pyruvate because of the presence of a novel enzyme. <u>The function of this novel enzyme will most likely be the conversion of acetaldehyde in the presence of carbondioxide back to pyruvate; thus making that step reversible</u>. This could be a possible explanation for the high level of pyruvate present in the yeast.
Answer:
Read the Explanation below.
Explanation:
1. I agree with the claim because you can see overall there is no difference in plant growth or variation if a plant has 30 ml of water or none at all.
2. I would measure the change in growth over a greater period of time to get a more accurate data set.
