Answer:
Good for US interest rate and the US exchange rate.
Explanation:
The predicted impact of this inflow of financial capital to the United states of America is good for the economy as well as for US interest rate and the US exchange rate when the movement of assets occur to the United states of America. The economy of the United states of America gets to be better due to this action of investors. This 2008 global financial crisis greatly damaged the economy of United states of America so this action bring some betterment in the economy.
Based on the scenario,
I think the relations that is not a function is :
B. (interest paid, amount in saving account)
The last two options are definitely a function
Hope this helps
Answer:
P/E ratio = $14.78
Explanation:
Market value per share = $42
earning per share = $ 2.84
As we know that:
Price earning ratio = market value per share / earning per share
= $42 / 2.84
= $14.78
Price earning ratio is an indicator to investor whether to invest in this company long term or not.
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>