Answer:
The correct answer is: Manuscript.
Explanation:
A manuscript is a type of speech delivery in which the speaker has to read what he/she has previously written on paper.
<u>Manuscript</u><u> deliveries are usually done in public speaking settings when the information has to be delivered in a precise manner by the speaker. </u>
<u>The upside of manuscript deliveries is that if the speaker uses this type of speech delivery he/she won't miss any fact or a bit of information.</u>
In this particular case, a political candidate is running for office and must give a speech that will lay out the details of her platform. The speech will be widely covered by newspapers and television. The method of delivery that the candidate is most likely to use is: Manuscript.
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
Answer:
Communism is a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
also, Communism is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money, and the state
Hiya,
A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.
Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.
A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.
Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.
Answer:
Cuba has had a socialist political system since 1959 based on the "one state - one party" principle.Cuba is constitutionally defined as a Marxist - Leninist socialist state guided in part by the political ideas of Korl Marx,one of the fathers of historical materialism,Friedrich Engels and Vladimir Lenin.
