Positive reinforcement. Because he leaves before everyone else
Answer:
Ego
Explanation:
Erik Erikson was widely known for his psychosocial theory of development, having modified Freud’s theory of psychosexual. However, in Erikson attempt to explain his psychosocial theory of development, placed more important role on how ego in each personality determines positive contributions to development of an individual, specifically in mastering attitudes, ideas, and skills at each stage of development.
Hence, the ability to grasp these developmental attitudes provides the children needed growth that is essential to their success and making of positive contributions as members of the society.
Therefore, Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the EGO than Freud had allowed.
I believe the answer is: universal principles
Universal principles refers to a set of principles that would mostly applicable to the majority of human being regardless of their background and environment.
Example of ethical decision based on universal principles would be not causing any physical harm to people unless you are in a self defense sitaution. This can be created because most people universally would not like being physically hurt.
Answer:
constructive
Explanation:
Memory: Memory is defined as a process that stores and remember a piece of information. There are three different types of memory i.e the sensory memory, short-term memory, and long-term memory.
Three main stages are responsible for memory formation i.e encoding, storage, and, retrieval. Although, memory doesn't work perfectly every time and any problem can occur in any of the stages.
The constructive memory states that a person can hold a variety of information i.e beliefs, behavior, attitude, and perception, etc to overcome the gaps.
In the question above, the game shows that memory is a constructive process.
Answer:
a Courtroom Workgroup
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the concept that describes this is known as a Courtroom Workgroup. Like mentioned in the question this term refers to an informal arrangement or relationship that exists in a courtroom between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer.