The advantage of a federal government would be It Allows local states to be independent and has an autonomy toward their territories, while providing opportunities for the central government to intervene.
The disadvantage would be there would be less uniformity between people on different states in response to the issues that the country face.
Answer:b. agenda setting
Explanation:
Media takes action when there are major new that are taking place throughout the world and people always need to know what is happening through media
It can be the President of the United States announcing what has happened in a particular region or state anything that affect the people they need to be provided with facts in order to grasp what is actual happening around them.
Something may be missed or ignore which is why agenda setting is crucial.
Agenda setting focuses on crucial issues to concentrate on for the public news,it deals with delivering what is relevant to people
The agenda setting theory is based two assumptions.
- The first one is that the media may adjust the news rather than reporting real news
- The second one is that the issue overemphasized by the media may seem more vital than it is
Types of Agenda Setting
There are three types of agenda setting:
- There is public agenda setting which focuses on crucial issues to be reported decided by the public.
- Media agenda setting defines viatal stories that need to be covered defined by the media
- Policy agenda setting is defined by both the public and the media which impact public policy makers
Answer:
a. Long Cycle Theory
Explanation:
In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.
The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.
Answer: i want a good day :)
Explanation:
