The correct answer would be, Cross-training program.
Each project team member had a back up that could fill in at a moment's notice should another team member fall by the way side. The project was able to mitigate risks in this fashion. Thanks to an aggressive Cross-training program.
Explanation:
A Cross Training Program is basically a program for employees in an organization in which employees are trained to perform tasks that are not in their own job description.
These training are done to build the skill sets and to ensure the coverage of key job responsibilities.
This approach of cross training is very useful in minimizing the risk as this training equip employees to do tasks that are not their own job but due to such training, they are able to perform the other tasks in emergency situations and thus are highly useful in risk management.
For example if there is a task which is to be completed by an employee in the coming week and the employee falls sick, then because some other employee is trained to do the task, that task won't be suffered an will be done on time by the back up employee.
Learn more about Cross Training Programs at:
brainly.com/question/11959276
#LearnWithBrainly
San bernardino county, california is the largest county in america
Answer:
To pay for their armies and other government projects, both empires collected a 25% tax on all agricultural earnings throughout their lands. Class structure was also similar in both empires.
Explanation:
Both empires were governed by a strong central bureaucracy that answered to the emperor. The large territories were further divided into provinces and districts with regional leaders and councils. Local leaders were given a lot of authority in order to streamline decision-making, but the emperors were still the ultimate authority. To pay for their armies and other government projects, both empires collected a 25% tax on all agricultural earnings throughout their lands.
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
Governor George C Wallace
