Answer:
if I'm correct I think both bondholders and shareholders
Answer:
d. $60,000
Explanation:
As per passive income rules, As stated under Internal Revenue Service is a kind of statement that allows to set off the passive loss as against passive income only.
There is no rule which permits to set it off against ordinary income.
Therefore, the details in the given instance are:
Loss of 2015 = ($80,000)
Income in 2016 = $20,000
Loss at the end of 2016 = ($60,000)
This because from the income in 2016 amounting $20,000 the loss of $20,000 is set off.
Explanation:
In the case of the complements goods, if the price of the soda rises, the demand would be decreased and the supply would rises. Since the soda and pizza are complementary goods so the impact of one good would be the same for another good also
Moreover, we also know that the price and the demand has an inverse relationship but the price and the supply has a direct relationship
Answer:
Option C would be the correct answer.
Explanation:
In the given question, options are not mentioned. Please find the attachment of the complete query.
- IFRS sets universal guidelines because whatever income accounts across the global economy can indeed be appropriate, straightforward, as well as equivalent.
- Its purpose is to provide a spatial relationship because of how government entities compile certain financial reports as well as publish them.
Certain alternatives do not apply to the procedure outlined. But the option above would be correct.
