Irrational numbers are the subset of real numbers that are not at all connected to the rest of numbers.
The subsets of real numbers are natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rational numbers and irrational numbers.
Natural numbers are subset of whole numbers, which are subset of integers, which are subset of rational numbers. Hence, all of them are interconnected. The set of irrational numbers is the only subset of real numbers which is not associated with the rest.
For example:-
1 is a natural number, whole number, integer, rational number but not irrational number. On the other hand, 
is an irrational number but none of the rest.
To learn more about real numbers, here:-
brainly.com/question/551408
#SPJ4
Answer:
if it's true simple interest then each year's interest is the same so interest for one year is a quarter of 241.50 which give you the rate but if each year's interest in left in the account the result will be different , it is a really poorly worded question
Answer:
(-4,-5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
here you go! :)
hope it helps!
Step-by-step explanation:
