Answer:
A) Irrational, because it is not a terminating or repeating decimal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Every time a square root results in a decimal, it will always never end, and never repeat. The square root of 35 qualifies for both of these qualities, therefore, making the answer (A). Hope this helps!
About 3.8 hours, if asking for a whole number round to 4
Since the numbers are consecutive, they must be near each other in size, and therefore near one-third of 168. And since the lower number is -2 off the middle, and the upper number is +2 from the middle, the middle number must be exactly one-third of 168—otherwise the sum of the three could never be 168. Labelling the three consecutive numbers as x, y, and z:
x + y + z = 168
(y-2) + y + (y+2) = 168.
3y = 168
y = 56
therefore the smallest number (x) = 54.
436 viewsView upvotes
1
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
i think you do it by like
12squared - 1.5 squared = A Squared
you do this to get the height
so
144- 2.25 = 141.75 then you square root it which equals 11.90
11.90×3÷2 = 17.85
17.85×6= 107. 15
im not sure
