Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer: G and F are mutually exclusive because they cannot occur together
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the definition of mutually exclusive events,
The events which can not occur together and probability of them occurring together is 0 are known as mutually exclusive events.
The first statement gives an implication that if one happens then other happens meaning they could both still happen so it is not true.
The second statement contradict the question about being mutually exclusive events.
The third statement also is a implication that if one event occurs then other does or does not occur.
The last statement is correct one that conforms with the question and obeys the definition of mutually exclusive events.
1. Is angle 2 and angle 5 are supplementary and the reason is the given
4. The answer is L || M because of the converse of the CIA theorem( corresponding interior angles)
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
2^2+2(4-2)
4+8-4
8
Hope this helps :D
