Material through which water flows is permeable. This material can be either natural or artificial. Naturally permeable material can be clean sand and gravel for example, or a sandstone and in the latter case the sandstone can have both porosity which is not synonymous with permeability as the pores must be connected to be permeable. An impermeable membrane could be used to line ditches for example to prevent leakage near mines.
Answer:
One
Explanation:
Sodium (Na) has one valence electron so it gets one dot.
Answer:
Phloem sap.
Explanation:
A colloid is a combination of different types of molecules mixed through other substances that will not join (form a chemical bond) with the other substance.
Phloem sap is a mixture of water, carbohydrates, hormones and other type of substances flowing together but not bond by a chemical bond.
Answer:
<em>The correct options are:</em>
<em>Prior to process 1, DNA should copy itself to allow the cell to divide.</em>
<em>Between processes 1 and 2, the mRNA must be modified before leaving the nucleus.</em>
Explanation:
For eukaryotes, the mRNA is made in the nucleus from the DNA. This process in known as transcription. The process of making proteins from the mRNA takes place in the ribososmes of the cytoplasm. This process is known as translation. The mRNA has to be modified before it is transported for translation. Otherwise, the mRNA will be degraded by the enzymes of the nucleus.
Answer:
Science has a central role in shaping what count as environmental problems. This has been evident most recently in the success of planetary science and environmental activism in stimulating awareness and discussion of global environmental problems. We advance three propositions about the special relationship between environmental science and politics: (1) in the formulation of science, not just in its application, certain courses of action are facilitated over others; (2) in global environmental discourse, moral and technocratic views of social action have been privileged; and (3) global environmental change, as science and movement ideology, is vulnerable to deconstructive pressures. These stem from different nations and differentiated social groups within nations having different interests in causing and alleviating environmental problems. We develop these propositions through a reconstruction of The Limits to Growth study of the early 1970s, make extensions to current studies of the human/social impacts of climate change, and review current sources of opposition to global and political formulations of environmental issues.
