1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
matrenka [14]
3 years ago
5

A cat-lover claims that cats are just as smart as dogs. In order to back this claim up with some evidence she organizes a study

at a large local pet daycare center. A random sample of 40 cats are selected and a random sample of 40 dogs are selected. Each of the selected animals is given one hour with a trainer in which the trainer attempts to teach them to roll over. Upon conclusion of the training, the proportion of dogs and proportion of cats that have learned this skill is computed. The trainer reports that she is 90% confident that the true difference in the proportion of all dogs and all cats (pD – pC) that can learn this skill with one hour of training is between ­–0.05 to 0.28.
Which of the following conclusions can be made based upon this confidence interval?

(A) Because most of the values in the confidence interval are positive, this proves that dogs are smarter than cats
(B) Because the point estimate of the confidence interval is positive, there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all dogs that can learn the skill with one hour of training is greater than the proportion of all cats that can learn the skill with one hour of training.
(C) Because O is contained in the interval, there is not convincing evidence that the proportion of all dogs that can learn the skill with one hour of training differs from the proportion of all cats that can learn the skill with one hour of training.
(D) Because 0.115 is contained in the interval, there is not convincing evidence of a difference in the population proportions.
(E) Because the margin of error of the confidence interval is greater than 0.05, there is not convincing evidence that the proportion of all dogs that can learn the skill with one hour of training differs from the proportion of all cats that can learn the skill with one hour of training.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Veronika [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(C) Because 0 is contained in the interval, there is not convincing evidence that the proportion of all dogs that can learn the skill with one hour of training differs from the proportion of all cats that can learn the skill with one hour of training.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Could someone pls help me
babunello [35]

Answer: y = 90   x = 29

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
if a smaller square of side 3 cm is cut out from a bigger square of side 9 cm to form a new shape ,What is the perimeter of the
Verdich [7]

Need to find:

  • Perimeter of new square formed?

~

Solution:

  • Side of smaller square = 3cm.
  • Side of Bigger square = 9cm

~

Using formula:

  • Perimeter of square = 4 × side

~

<u>Perimeter of smaller </u><u>square:</u>

⟹ 4 × 3

⟹ 12 cm

~

<u>Perimeter of Bigger square:</u>

⟹ 4 × 9

⟹ 36cm

~

Perimeter of new square = Perimeter of Bigger square - Perimeter of smaller square

⟹ 36 - 12

⟹ 24 cm

~

∴ Perimeter of new square formed is 24 cm.

8 0
3 years ago
Lionel gave 1/2 of his baseball cards to Rick. He gave his brother 1/2 of what was left. He then had 12 cards left. How many did
Salsk061 [2.6K]
C. 48

If Lionel started with 48, and he gave 1/2 of them to Rick (24), then he is left with 24. If he then gives his brother 1/2 of that (12) then he has 12 left.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a positive angle less than 360 degrees that is conterminal with 540 degrees
jekas [21]

Answer:

Please check the explanation.

Step-by-step explanation:

As we have to determine a positive angle less than 360 degrees that is conterminal with 540 degrees.

so

  • Subtract 360° from 540°

540° - 360° = 180°

The resulting angle of 180° is positive, less than 360°, and coterminal with 540°.

7 0
3 years ago
If u, v, and w are nonzero vectors in r 2 , is w a linear combination of u and v?
Tju [1.3M]
Not necessarily. \mathbf u and \mathbf v may be linearly dependent, so that their span forms a subspace of \mathbb R^2 that does not contain every vector in \mathbb R^2.

For example, we could have \mathbf u=(0,1) and \mathbf v=(0,-1). Any vector \mathbf w of the form (r,0), where r\neq0, is impossible to obtain as a linear combination of these \mathbf u and \mathbf v, since

c_1\mathbf u+c_2\mathbf v=(0,c_1)+(0,-c_2)=(0,c_1-c_2)\neq(r,0)

unless r=0 and c_1=c_2.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the 92nd term of the arithmetic sequence 11,19,27
    5·1 answer
  • HELPPPP WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    10·1 answer
  • NEED HELP WORTH 50 POINTS !!
    11·2 answers
  • What is the vertex of the graph of y= x ^2+4x
    9·1 answer
  • I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF YOU GET IT CORRECT!
    8·2 answers
  • Geometric proofs <br>Can someone explain how to do number 1? <br>It would really help
    10·1 answer
  • How do I solve 34 x 17 using an area model
    7·1 answer
  • Use compatible numbers to find two estimates for 42 divided by 396
    11·1 answer
  • Solve for X. y=1/4 (x)+3
    8·1 answer
  • Which sets of ordered pairs show equivalent ratios?. Check all that apply. (1, 2), (2, 3), (4, 7) (2, 2), (4, 4), (6, 6) (3, 1),
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!