From anecdotes he heard, Edward Jenner came up with the premise and conclusion that dairy maids could not get small pox because they had previously been exposed to the virus.
<h3>
What was conclusion of Edward jenner in case of small pox?</h3>
He also came to the conclusion that small pox may be passed from one person to the next. Edward Jenner came to this conclusion based on stories he had heard about dairy maids being immune to smallpox.
In 1736, Edward Jenner met Sarah Nelms, a young dairy girl with small pox lesions. Edward Jenner then vaccinated an 8-year-old kid named James Phipps with material from Nelms' small pox lesion. James Phipps suffered a fever and became unwell, but he recovered completely after ten days.
Jenner infected the same boy with materials from a fresh small pox lesion a month later. There was no sickness in the boy.
When Edward Jenner was inoculated/vaccinated with matter from a small pox lesion, he came to the conclusion that he could acquire total protection from small pox.
For more information regarding small pox, visit:
brainly.com/question/15524204
#SPJ1
Explanation:
this is the best I can do for you sorry let me know if this helps any.
When a stem cell divides, it first becomes an immature red blood cell, white blood cell, or platelet-producing cell. The immature cell then divides, matures further, and ultimately becomes a mature red blood cell, white blood cell, or platelet.
<span>Chromatids (either of the 2 chromosome strands that separate during mitosis) would not be fully developed.</span>
Answer: Option B
The enzyme has changed shape because of high temperature.
Explanation:
Enzymes are biological catalysts in living organisms that speed up the rate of chemical reactions.
High temperature changes the shape of enzymes.
Increase or high temperature lead to decrease in enzymes activities. This is due to enzyme protein been denatures by high temperature which is the breaking of molecular bonds within the enzyme protein. When the enzymes bonds are broken, the shape of the enzymes changes and they no longer act as catalysts.
Answer:
It would certainly make a difference.
Explanation:
The mass of a planet determines how thick the planets atmosphere would be, if it can even sustain an atmosphere. If all the masses are the same, all of the large planets would not be able to sustain life, while all of the smaller, denser planets still have a chance.
The mass of a planet also affects it’s gravitational pull. If all of the planets had the same mass, they would all have the same gravitational pull, meaning that they would all attract the same amount of asteroids, meteors, and other spacial objects.
Overall, the simulation would certainly be different, for many, many reasons. The above are only two, and if you would like more, just add a comment and I can give you more.
