Answer:
For the Economist A the spending multiplier is = 8, the tax multiplier = 4, the increase in spending is = $4 billion, the tax cut is = $8 billion.
For the Economist B, the spending multiplier is =4, the tax multiplier = 2, the increase in spending is = $8 billion, the tax cut is = $16 billion.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(1)The Economist A
The Spending multiplier = 8
In closing the output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 8 = $4 billion
Thus,
The tax multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
(2)The Economist B
Now,
The spending multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
So,
Tax multiplier = 2
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 2 = $16 billion
I'd assume it'd be the shoulder belt. What were your options?
Answer:
Letter c is correct
Explanation:
In this case, the amount of supply will be smaller and the price may remain, rise or fall. The factor that influences this price behavior is the law of supply and demand, it will determine what will be the prices of a market. So if there is a balance between supply and demand, the most likely to happen is price stabilization, which can be changed more or less depending on other economic factors that may arise, such as the emergence of a competitor.
Answer:
When demand shocks lead to recessions, it is mainly due to unexpected changes in the:
the inability of government policy to affect demand.
Explanation:
Government has every right to make policies that would strictly affect price, if this is not done and there is inflation of price it would lead to recession.
Answer: $155,520
Explanation:
Pension Expense = Service Cost - Expected return on plan assets + Prior service cost amortization + Interest cost
Interest Cost
= Interest rate * Projected benefit obligation
= 0.09 * 728,000
= $65,520
Pension Expense = 110,000 - 30,000 + 10,000 + 65,520
= $155,520
