This really depends on your beliefs in if gender discrimination is as big of a deal as racial discrimination. The 14th amendment is the Equal Protection Clause, it was mainly for the slaves that had been freed in the U.S after the civil war. It basically forbids the states to restrict basic rights of citizens without going through the process of law or being protected by the law. But has recently been used in cases to of gender discrimination.
I believe it is perfectly justified for the 14th amendment to be acted in cases of gender discrimination. The 14th amendment does not have to be dedicated completely to race, but can have multiple purposes and be dedicated to gender discrimination as well. Because the 14th amendment does not mention race in its context, but mentions that basic rights shall not be stripped from citizens.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Paternalistic." The approach of the early American juvenile court is best described as Paternalistic. Juvenile courts are more involved on cases that is created by minor people.
Answer:
C Even though the couple is poorly dressed, they are millionaires.
Answer:
All The Above
Explanation:
Articles of confederation initially made to create a form of government that give the power to the local rather than central government. At that time, we just got our freedom from the British Empire and the founding fathers swore to create a government that does not give power to small groups of nobles such as the monarchy.
So huge responsibilities such as Taxing citizens and Regulate trade was given to the states rather than the national government.
'Require states to contribute money to the national government
' ,and could 'not Pass a law unless nine of the 13 states agreed' also made as a form of protection to the states. This rule was created to make sure that the national government could not coerce the states to conform to their will.
