Answer:
This question lacks options, options are:
A. authoritative
B. neglectful
C. incompetent
D. authoritarian
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Neglectful style is characterized by the non-affective involvement of the parents in the affairs of the children and by the resignation in the educational task, that is, the parents are not involved in raising their children and, therefore, do not provide the necessary support they do not guide their children. They show no affection or discipline, both due to lack of time or interest and negligence or comfort. According to studies, these children obtain the lowest scores in self-esteem, in the development of cognitive abilities and in school achievement, as well as in autonomy and the responsible use of freedom.
Rules for God we have to obey
Answer:
the answer would be B,D,A
Explanation:
hope this helps
The major flaw
was that it is not at all ethical by any means to expose a child and induce
fear in him, fear is a harmful element and especially when the subject is a
child it becomes more unethical.
This was a famous
experiment by John Watson and Rosalie Rayner for which they received much
criticism. The child whose name was "Albert" but is famously known as
"Little Albert" moved shortly after the experiment so it was a
mystery what happened to him until recently when he was found as “<span>Douglas Merritte” who died before he was found.</span>
Bernard Marx changes a lot throughout the novel "Brave New World," and because of this, it is difficult to establish whether Bernard is really an enemy of the World State. However, the most likely answer is that he is.
The greatest threat to the system, according to this society, is an individual that is unorthodox. This means, an individual that is different from all others and who thinks in a way that is uncommon. This is certainly the case with Bernard, as he is able to feel jealousy, lovesickness and frustrated desire in a society that has "eliminated" it. No one else seems to share these feelings. Therefore, the accusations are true, as Bernard does exhibit an unorthodox behaviour.
The reason why the World State considers this kind of thinking to be dangerous is because it has the possibility of extending to others. If Bernard were to convince people to think like him, many of the assumptions of society would collapse, leading to chaos among people and to the end of the World State regime. I believe that, in some occasions, society is more important than an individual. For example, we create laws that restrict individual freedom in order to protect the interests of society. However, the World State takes this belief too far by completely ignoring the importance of a human life.
