Answer:
I think C
Explanation:
C because you can eliminate all of them except for D and C. If you think about it, D can be eliminated because in the US, people couldn't vote a black president and the same could be said for South Africa
Answer:
The battle of bunker hill and boycott of British goods
Explanation:
The battle of bunker hill fought between the colonists and Britishers in America. It's the second major battle of the American War in 1775 which led to British victory using tactics. British were successful in capturing fortified sites but realized that fighting the settlers wouldn't be as simple as they had thought.
The colonists boycotted British goods to show their protest against imposed taxes and rule by the British.
The German economy was very weak and needed a strong leader to unite them all under one cause. Another reason is they were angry that Germany had lost WW1
Answer:
The answer is: letter A, Naturalistic Observation
Explanation:
Naturalistic Observation is one of the research methods that is used in order to study the subjects in their natural habitat (environment). This is being conducted when the laboratory experimentation is deemed unrealistic. The normal reaction of the subjects in the real world are being studied here. So, one way to do this is by setting up a "hidden camera" in order to record the subjects' behaviors. However, one disadvantage of this is the difference is conclusion that every researcher has about the behavior they have witnessed. Thus, it results into clashes of causative factors.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:The Berlin Conference of 1884–85, also known as the Congo Conference (German: Kongokonferenz) or West Africa Conference (Westafrika-Konferenz),[1] regulated European colonization and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism period and coincided with Germany's sudden emergence as an imperial power. The conference was organized by Otto von Bismarck, first Chancellor of Germany; its outcome, the General Act of the Berlin Conference, can be seen as the formalisation of the Scramble for Africa, although some scholars of history warn against an overemphasis of its role in the colonial partitioning of Africa, drawing attention to bilateral agreements concluded before and after the conference.[2][3] The conference ushered in a period of heightened colonial activity by European powers, which eliminated or overrode most existing forms of African autonomy and self-governance.[4]
Explanation:
