Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hihsjskdjdbd
Washington's successor was John Adams.
John Adams was the first Federalist president.
Project 1 is the name of the research program trying to mimic the motor
Mesopotamia introduced a more sedentary way of life by means of agriculture and animal husbandry. So for example, instead of the nomadic way of life, which is/was going hunting, foraging, and/or fishing.
Hopefully this is right and helpful. Good luck!
