Answer:
<em>not</em> a rectangle
Step-by-step explanation:
There are several ways to determine whether the quadrilateral is a rectangle. Computing slope is one of the more time-consuming. We can already learn that the figure is not a rectangle by seeing if the midpoint of AC is the same as that of BD. (It is not.) A+C = (-5+4, 5+2) = (-1, 7). B+D = (1-2, 8-2) = (-1, 6). (A+C)/2 ≠ (B+D)/2, so the midpoints of the diagonals are different points.
___
The slope of AB is ∆y/∆x, where the ∆y is the change in y-coordinates, and ∆x is the change in x-coordinates.
... AB slope = (8-5)/(1-(-5)) = 3/6 = 1/2
The slope of AD is computed in similar fashion.
... AD slope = (-2-5)/(-2-(-5)) = -7/3
The product of these slopes is (1/2)(-7/3) = -7/6 ≠ -1. Since the product is not -1, the segments AB and AD are not perpendicular to each other. Adjacent sides of a rectangle are perpendicular, so this figure is not a rectangle.
___
Our preliminary work with the diagonals showed us the figure was not a parallelogram (hence not a rectangle). For our slope calculation, we "magically" chose two sides that were not perpendicular. In fact, this choice was by "trial and error". Side BC <em>is perpendicular</em> to AB, so we needed to choose a different side to find one that wasn't. A graph of the points is informative, but we didn't start with that.
I believe the normal distribution is symmetrical above and below
the mean. That tells us that in this kind of distribution, the mean
and the median are the same number ... 50% of the population
is below it, and 50% is above it.
So if the female Labs' weight actually follows a 'normal' distribution
with a mean of 62.5 lbs, then 2,700 of them weigh more than 62.5 lbs
and 2,700 of them weigh less than that.
The standard deviation doesn't matter.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the geometric sequence: 1, -2, 4, -8, ...
Find the common ratio:


substitute:

Substitute

to


Answer:50.27 centimeters
Step-by-step explanation: