Answer:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Explanation:
The name of the act was given because of the two leaders who jointly worked together to regain the trust of potential investors in the financial system. The act discussed the auditing requirements, directors roles and responsibilities and the signing of the annual report by the directors as well and also that the CFO and CEO will form an opinion about the firms future, goals and giving the undertaking that the financial statement are accurate according to their knwoledge.
Answer:
b. Debt ratio
Explanation:
The liquidity ratio includes the current ratio, quick ratio, etc
where,
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
And, Quick ratio = Quick assets ÷ total current liabilities
where,
Quick assets = Cash and cash equivalents + short-term investments + Accounts receivable (net)
These two ratios check the liquidity of the business organization whereas debt ratio shows a relationship between the total liabilities and the total assets. It checks the leverage of the firm whether it is capable to repay the borrowed amount or not
Hence, option b is correct
The answer is true, hope that helps!!
Answer:
Letter A is correct.<em> Complementary product pricing.</em>
Explanation:
Organizations use the strategy of adopting a complementary product pricing to increase the total profit of a product group.
This strategy is used when the company sells products that are complementary, ie the use of one is complemented by the use of the other, so the company substantially decreases the price of a product, usually just to cover costs, and guarantees gains from a product with a high price and very high profit margin.
The benefits added to the complementary price of a product are market gain, competitors' entry barriers and retention and attraction of new consumers.
Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.
