All categories

3 years ago

Ratio as a fraction 12:36

Mathematics

2 answers:

poizon [28]3 years ago

7 0

Step-by-step explanation:

$12:36=\dfrac{12}{36}=\dfrac{12:12}{36:12}=\dfrac{1}{3}$

Elodia [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer: 1/3

Step-by-step explanation: The ratio 12:36 can be written as the fraction 12/36. So, we simply put the 12 as the numerator of our fraction and put the 36 as the denominator of our fraction.

12/36 can be simplified by dividing the numerator and the denominator by the greatest common factor of 12 and 36 which is 12 and we get the fraction 1/3.

The fraction 1/3 still represents the ratio 1/3 even though we have written it in the form of a/b or fraction form.

You might be interested in

HELP ASAP. The length of the rectangle is five centimeters is less than twice it’s width. The perimeter of the rectangle is 26 c

TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

L = 7, W = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

All I did was I wrote out the equations, L = 2w - 5 and 2L + 2W = 26. I then substituted what L was into the equation and solves. Here's my work if you would like to see it.

8 0

3 years ago

-6(a + 8) I need help!

Yuliya22 [10]

Answer: I got -6a + 48

Step-by-step explanation:I distributed and I got negative 6a because when you distributed the variable goes with whatever number is before it and I got 48 because -6 multiplied by 8 you get positive 48 because the 8 is bigger then the negative 6 so I don't know if your teacher wants you to solve for the answer but like I said I got -6a + 48

8 0

3 years ago

I need help people get brailestttt

vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Whats the question?

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Brian buys a computer for £4300. It depreciates at a rate of 3% per year. How much will it be worth in 6 years? Give your answer

aalyn [17]

Answer:

3526

Step-by-step explanation:

4300×3%=129

129×6=774

4300_774= 3526

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Leila says that 75% of a number will always be greater than 50% of any other number. Complete one inequality to support Leilas c

Greeley [361]

If a number is positive, Leila's theory that 75% of a number will always be greater than 50% of another number is true; however, if both numbers are negative, or if the number of which she finds 50% is much greater than the number of which she finds 75%, Leila's theory could be incorrect.

This inequality shows that Leila is correct: $100(0.75) \geq 50(0.50)$ (which simplifies to $75 \geq 25$ )

This inequality shows that Leila is incorrect: $50(0.75) \geq 100(0.50)$ (which simplifies to $37.5 \geq 50$ )

Hope this helps!

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers