Answer:
a) Limited liability company
Explanation:
Considering the options given, as an advisor the form of business that I would recommend is: limited liability company that is a structure in which the owners are not responsible with their personal assets for the company's debts as the three owners are concerned about this risk.
I would not advise the other forms of business because the sole proprietorship is a firm that is run by one person, the general partnership is a structure in which two or more people agree to share unlimited liability which means that they share all their personal assets and are responsible for any debt the company has with them and the master limited partnership is a company that trades securities in the market.
The answer is False because they didn't plan functions as a local law..this is my opinion.
Answer:
$1,956,684
Explanation:
As the project has a expected annual return, we have to calculate future value of this investment to find how much money Cll, Inc. will have after 10 years to reinvest.
We know,
FV = PV × 
Given,
Present Value, PV = $630,000
Annual rate of return, i = 12% = 0.12
Number of period, n = 10 years
Putting the value into the above formula, we can get,
FV = $630,000 × 
FV = $630,000 × 3.105848
FV = $1,956,684
$1,956,684 can be reinvested after the liquidation of 10 years.
A firm could continue to operate for
years without ever earning a profit as long as it is producing an output where
<span> B. MR
>AVC</span>
<span>MR stands
for marginal revenue which is the sale price of a single item sold. On the
other hand, AVC or the average variable cost is the firm’s variable costs
divided by its output that is produced.</span>
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
