The converse of t > r is r > t
<h3>What is a converse statement?</h3>
A converse statement is determined when both the hypothesis and conclusion are reversed or interchanged.
In this condition, the hypothesis is written as the conclusion and the conclusion is changed to be the hypothesis.
If a conditional statement is written as: x → y
The converse is then written as y → x
Where;
- x is the hypothesis
- y is the conclusion
Given the expression as;
t > r
We can see that;
- The variable 't' is the hypothesis
- The variable 'r' is the conclusion
The converse will be;
r > t
Hence, the converse is r > t
Learn more about converse statement here:
brainly.com/question/3965750
#SPJ1
![\bf \cfrac{(x-2)(x+3)}{2x+2}\implies \cfrac{x^2+x-6}{2x+2}~~ \begin{array}{llll} \leftarrow \textit{2nd degree polynomial}\\ \leftarrow \textit{1st degree polynomial} \end{array} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{vertical asymptote}}{2x+2=0}\implies 2x=-2\implies x=-\cfrac{2}{2}\implies x=-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B%28x-2%29%28x%2B3%29%7D%7B2x%2B2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%5E2%2Bx-6%7D%7B2x%2B2%7D~~%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bllll%7D%20%5Cleftarrow%20%5Ctextit%7B2nd%20degree%20polynomial%7D%5C%5C%20%5Cleftarrow%20%5Ctextit%7B1st%20degree%20polynomial%7D%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bvertical%20asymptote%7D%7D%7B2x%2B2%3D0%7D%5Cimplies%202x%3D-2%5Cimplies%20x%3D-%5Ccfrac%7B2%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20x%3D-1)
when the degree of the numerator is greater than the denominator's, then it has no horizontal asymptotes.
quick note:
when the degree of the numerator is 1 higher than the degree of the denominator, then it has an slant-asymptote, so this one has a slant-asymptote.
The answer is (B) 8. have a nice day
Answer:
$ 51.59
Step-by-step explanation:
Nate has shares worth $ 36.85.
He says that the value of these shares increased by $ 2 plus 40% of their original value, therefore the final value would be as follows:
$ 2 + $ 36.85 * 0.40 = $ 2 + $ 14.74 = $ 16.74, was the increase.
The sale value was of this increase plus the original value, therefore:
$ 36.85 + $ 14.74 = $ 51.59
Nate sold the shares at a value of $ 51.59.
A+b+c=408
a=a
b=7+a
c=5+a
a+(7+a)+(5+a)=408
3a+12=408
3a=396
a=132
Abel has $132
Belle has $139
Cindy has $137
Prove:
132+139+137=408
