The correct answer to this open question is the following.
We are talking about colonial times in North America, where white English people left Britain in order to pursue new goals and have better opportunities in the new continent.
The development of the southern colonies stemmed from the effort and perseverance of the people. The southern colonies were Maryland, Virginia, and Carolina, which years after divided in two: North and South Carolina. The location and place of these southern colonies were an important factor for their development. The good soil of the land and good climate conditions allowed farmers to grow great crops to the degree that southern colonies were known as the "breadbasket of America." They exported their crops to Europe, where there was a big demand for corn, Indigo, rice, and tobacco. This represented a big advantage for economic development.
Regarding the relations with Native American Indian tribes, at first, colonists tried to maintain a peaceful coexistence to try to live in harmony with them, but things complicated when more people arrived at these regions and tried to exploit more raw materials that were in the Indian territories.
Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Outside Israel King David waged successful wars and ordered neighboring states from Damascus and Moab to the Red Sea to exercise his supreme authority. However, he failed to conquer the cities of the Philistines.
Explanation:
- He conquered Jerusalem, chose it as the capital of the kingdom, transmitted there the Ark of the Covenant, fortified it and built it.
- He organized a civilian administration and a standing Israeli army.
- In several wars, he defeated the Philistines and other neighboring tribes (Ammonites, Syrians, etc.) and extended the borders of his kingdom.
Class: History
Level: Middle school
Keywords: King David, Moab, Red Sea
Learn more on King David on
brainly.com/question/1574420
brainly.com/question/6464461
#learnwithBrainly
This is one of the most complicated and debated issues in 20th century American history. Many historians argue that the killing of President Kennedy had a few particular results:
1. Increased tensions between the U.S. and Soviet Union. At the time of Kennedy's killing, he was is the midst of negotiating a peace treaty with the Soviets, a treaty that was not supported by the following administration.
2. An increased American military presence in Vietnam. President Kennedy was considering pulling American military advisors out of Vietnam. His death, many historians feel, indirectly lead to the Vietnam War.
3. A sense of paranoia and distrust in the American government from American citizens. In the years following the death of President Kennedy, many Americans came to doubt the official story of Kennedy's death and believed that the government was hiding information from the public.
