1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrey2020 [161]
4 years ago
6

Solve the system using either Gaussian elimination with back-substitution or Gauss-Jordan elimination. (If there is no solution,

enter NO SOLUTION. If the system has an infinite number of solutions, set y = t and solve for x in terms of t.) −3x + 5y = −34 3x + 4y = −11 4x − 8y = 52
Mathematics
1 answer:
Katyanochek1 [597]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The solution of the system of equations is x=3\\y=-5.

Step-by-step explanation:

Gauss–Jordan elimination is a procedure for converting a matrix to reduced row echelon form using elementary row operations.

It relies upon three elementary row operations one can use on a matrix:

  1. Swap the positions of two of the rows
  2. Multiply one of the rows by a nonzero scalar.
  3. Add or subtract the scalar multiple of one row to another row.

To find the solution of the system

-3x + 5y = -34 \\3x + 4y = -11 \\4x -8y = 52

using Gauss-Jordan elimination you must:

Step 1: Transform the augmented matrix to the reduced row echelon form.

In an augmented matrix, each row represents one equation in the system and each column represents a variable or the constant terms.

This is the augmented matrix that represents the system.

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & 5 & -34 \\\\ 3 & 4 & -11 \\\\ 4 & -8 & 52 \end{array} \right]

Using elementary matrix operations, we get that

Row Operation 1: Add row 1 to row 2 \left(R_2=R_2+R_1\right)

Row Operation 2: Divide row 1 by −3 \left(R_1=\frac{R_1}{-3}\right)

Row Operation 3: Subtract row 1 multiplied by 4 from row 3 \left(R_3=R_3-\left(4\right)R_1\right)

Row Operation 4: Divide row 2 by 9 \left(R_2=\frac{R_2}{9}\right)

Row Operation 5: Add row 2 multiplied by 5/3 to row 1 \left(R_1=R_1+\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)R_2\right)

Row Operation 6: Add row 2 multiplied by 4/3 to row 3 \left(R_3=R_3+\left(\frac{4}{3}\right)R_2\right)

This is the reduced row echelon form matrix

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 3 \\\\ 0 & 1 & -5 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right]

Step 2: Interpret the reduced row echelon form

The reduced row echelon form of the augmented matrix corresponds to the system

x=3\\y=-5

You might be interested in
In the function f(x) = (x - 2)^2 + 4, the minimum occurs at
wolverine [178]

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a parabola in vertex form is

y = a(x - h)² + k

where (h, k) are the coordinates of the vertex and a is a multiplier

The max/ min of the function is the value of k

f(x) = (x - 2)² + 4 ← is in vertex form

with (h, k) = (2, 4 ) → k = 4

Thus minimum occurs at 4

4 0
3 years ago
The ratio of red cars to blue cars in a parking lot was 5 : 3. If there were 40 red cars, how many blue cars were there?
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

24 blue cars

Step-by-step explanation:

In this problem, one is given the ratio of red to blue cars in the parking lot. One is given the actual number of red cars, and one is asked to find the number of blue cars. One can set up a proportion; ratio to actual, then solve to find the number of actual blue cars using the method of cross-products. One can set up the proportion using the ratios, but it is easier to express the proportion as the equality of two fractions. Thus, the following equation can be formed, let the parameter (x) represent the actual amount of blue cars;

\frac{red}{blue}= \frac{5}{3} = \frac{40}{x}

Cross products,

5x = 120

Inverse operations,

x = 24

4 0
3 years ago
Factor completely<br> 486+108x+6x^2<br><br> Thank you!
viktelen [127]

Answer:

6(x + 9) (x + 9)

or

6 (x+9)^{2}

Step-by-step explanation:

468 + 108x + 6x^{2} \\6x^{2} +108x + 468

Greatest common factor of 6, 108, and 486:

6 x 1 = 6

6 x 18 = 108

6 x 81 = 486

GCF: 6

so:

6(x^{2} +18x +81)

x^{2} +18x + 81

factors to:

(x + 9) (x + 9)

because:

9 x 9 = 81

9 + 9 = 18

So:

It factors completely too:

6(x + 9) (x + 9)

or

6 (x+9)^{2}

6 0
3 years ago
Emilia made fewer than 27 bracelets last week. The variable b represents the number of bracelets. The inequality describes the n
Mazyrski [523]
B < 27. Hope it helps!
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help ....,?.?.??.?.?..?.?.?.?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does anyone know it?
    12·1 answer
  • Please can you fully factorise these equasions?
    9·2 answers
  • The decimal 0.15 can be written as which fraction?
    8·1 answer
  • How is " y^2 + root 2 " a polynomial in one variable.​
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME QUICK!!!How many unique triangles can be made where one angle measures 60 degrees and another angle is an obtuse
    9·1 answer
  • - 2(w+6) +9&lt; - 15<br><br>I'm make you brainliest​
    13·2 answers
  • He box-and-whisker plot describes the scores of hockey teams in a recent tournament.
    13·1 answer
  • Help please i beg you​
    13·2 answers
  • If lines BG↔ and CF↔ are parallel, then LD−→− is proportional to MD−→−. Is this statement correct? Explain your answer.
    9·2 answers
  • Solve for X and y PLEASE GIVE FULL EXPLANATION HOW YOU GOT IT
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!