The destruction of an opponent’s resources is the best description of a scorched earth policy.
Option B
<u>Explanation</u>:
A strategy used by the military of a nation that aims to destroy the assets which might be useful for the opponent or enemy to attack when retreating from a position. This military strategy used becomes a policy which is known as scorched earth policy.
The assets they aims to destroy are usually weapons, any industrial resources, communication sites and vehicles used for transportation. This whole process is carried by the military either in the enemy territory or in its home territory while invading.
I think it's a complicated proposition, usually people with psychic problems are often not taken seriously, and seen as less deserving. I think maybe you should see a different uncle thanking them for thanking them, as it is also difficult for people who have been seriously injured. Perhaps a form of support and after the completion of treatment the medal.
The correct answer is the social-cognitive perspective.
According to the social-cognitive perspective, human behavior and actions are not only influenced by personal traits and enduring inner characteristics, but also by the situations people find themselves in. For instance, a person who is normally loud, outspoken and humorous will not behave in this manner if he or she is in a serious situation such as a job interview, an important work meeting or at a funeral.
The statement is true. In the case Feiner v. New York, Chief
Justice Fred Vinson discussed in his opinion that the Court has used the “clear
and present danger” principle. The chief justice believes that the arrest of
Feiner was necessary in order to protect “the interest of the community in
maintaining peace and order on its streets”.
