The correct answer would be B
Answer:
The Loisels are upset about losing the necklace because:
A. The necklace belongs to someone else and they feel obligated to
replace it.
Explanation:
This question is about the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant. Mathilde Loisel, the main character, is a woman of elegant tastes but little money. <u>She borrows a fancy diamond necklace from a friend of hers to attend a party with her husband. On the way back home, she somehow loses the necklace. Since her husband does not earn a lot, and since they feel obligated to replace the lost necklace, they end up borrowing money.</u> It takes the Loisels ten years to pay their debt off. Ironically, that is when Madame Loisel finds out the lost necklace was actually a fake one, worth much less than the real one she and her husband bought to replace it.
Answer:
1. Minnesota - St. paul
2. South Dakota - Pierre
3. Iowa - Des Moines
4) Wisconsin - Madison
5. Missouri - Jefferson City
6. Wyoming - Cheyenne
7. Colorado - Denver
8. Utah - Salt Lake City
9. Arizona - Phoenix
10. New Mexico - Santa Fe
11. Oklahoma - Oklahoma City
12. Texas - Austin
The point of view of the narrator in the passage provided is that of the first person.
<h3>What is Point of View?</h3>
This is referred to the angle from which a story was told and determines what the reader is able to access from it.
The passage given depicts a first person point of view. This is because the reader can be inferred as performing the action as a character in the story thereby making it the most appropriate choice.
Read more about Point of View here brainly.com/question/1999125
#SPJ4
One of the disturbing facts of history is that so many civilizations collapse. Few people, however, least of all our politicians, realize that a primary cause of the collapse of those societies has been the destruction of the environmental resources on which they depended. Fewer still appreciate that many of those civilizations share a sharp curve of decline. Indeed, a society's demise may begin only a decade or two after it reaches its peak population, wealth, and power.
Another popular misconception is that we can trust in technology to solve our problems. Whatever environmental problem you name, you can also name some hoped-for technological solution under discussion. Some of us have faith that we shall solve our dependence on fossil fuels by developing new technologies for hydrogen engines, wind energy, or solar energy. Some of us have faith that we shall solve our food problems with new or soon-to-be-developed genetically modified crops. Some of us have faith that new technologies will succeed in cleaning up the toxic materials in our air, water, soil, and foods without the horrendous cleanup expenses that we now incur.
The final misconception holds that environmentalists are fear-mongering, overreacting extremists whose predictions of impending disaster have been proved wrong before and will be proved wrong again. Behold, say the optimists: water still flows from our faucets, the grass is still green, and the supermarkets are full of food. We are more prosperous than ever before, and that's the final proof that our system works.
