Well, an objective summary basically sums up the main key points, or the theme. It's like telling your friend about this passage. What would you tell them? What does the setting look like? Characters? Examples of an objective summary would be talking about what happened and what you think is most important throughout the story. Like in this story, I suggest write about their conversation. What are they talking about? What seems to be important here?
Answer:
"A perfect taste made possible by the most brutal labor."
Explanation:
The authors are claiming that sugar, more inexpensive and sweeter than honey, are created through a viscous way.
A proof was given in the passage:
"Europeans bought a product made thousands of miles away that was less expensive than the honey from down the road. That was possible only <em>because sugar set people in motion all across the world—millions of them as slaves, in chains; a few in search of their fortunes</em>"
Hope this helps.
Answer:
I believe c is the answer
Explanation:
In chemistry, a solution is a special type of homogeneous mixture composed of two or more substances. In such a mixture, a solute is a substance dissolved in another substance, known as a solvent. The mixing process of a solution happens at a scale where the effects of chemical polarity are involved, resulting in interactions that are specific to solvation. The solution usually has the state of the solvent when the solvent is the larger fraction of the mixture, as is commonly the case. One important parameter of a solution is the concentration, which is a measure of the amount of solute in a given amount of solution or solvent. The term "aqueous solution" is used when one of the solvents is water.
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
