Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
the International Trade Organization.
Explanation:
The Bretton Woods system was a post-World War II reconstruction plan which took place in New Hampshire to found three key institutions to promote capitalism, policy coordination and free trade respectively: the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which later became the World Bank, and the International Trade Organization, which later became the World Trade Organization.
I think manipulation. Sorry if it’s wrong
Explanation:
Marketing is profitably using the results of studying short term and long term needs of those who can pay for a one-time, or in most cases, a steady flow of service or product placement. In 2017 The New York Times described it as "the art of telling stories so enthralling that people lose track of their wallets.[1]
It is one of the primary components of business management and commerce.[2] Marketers can direct their product to other businesses (B2B marketing) or directly to consumers (B2C marketing).[3] Regardless of who is being marketed to, several factors apply, including the perspective the marketers will use. Known as market orientations, they determine how marketers will approach the planning stage of marketing.[4]
The marketing mix, which outlines the specifics of the product and how it will be sold,[5][6] is affected by the environment surrounding the product,[7] the results of marketing research and market research,[8][9] and the characteristics of the product's target market.[10] Once these factors are determined, marketers must then decide what methods will be used to promote the product,[3] including use of coupons and other price inducements.[11]
The term marketing, what is commonly known as attracting customers, incorporates knowledge gained by studying the management of exchange relationships[12][13] and is the business process of identifying, anticipating and satisfying customers' needs and wants.
Answer:
There are positioning to be brought by a client
