1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Allushta [10]
2 years ago
9

You have 87 marbles Round that number to the nearest ten.

Mathematics
1 answer:
ratelena [41]2 years ago
7 0

The answer is 90 marbles

You might be interested in
What's the expanded form to write 16,107,320
Romashka [77]
(10,000,000) + (6,000,000) + (100,000) + (7,000) + (300) + (20)
6 0
2 years ago
Anyone know the answer?​
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
I’m pretty sure it’s d but i’m not 100%
5 0
3 years ago
Which ratio is equivalent to 1 to 8?<br> 7 to 14<br> 7 to 9<br> 6 to 41<br> 6 to 48
Ivan

6 to 48 simplified

it becomes 1 to 8

so the answer is 6 to 48

plz mark as brainliest

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A muffin recipe, which yields 12 muffins, calls for 2/3 cup of milk for every 1 3/4 cups of flour. The same recipe calls for 1/4
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

First I'm making all mixed numbers improper fractions.

Base recipe: 12 muffins = 2/3 milk + 7/4 flour + 1/4 coconut + 3/4 apple

Change: 9/8 apple

On second look, I ddn't need to do that except for the last one, the change in apple.  When increasing things proportionally you basically multiply everything by the same number.  A simple example.

Say a recipe made 10 of something with 1 of ingredient A and 2 of ingredient B.  Well, what if you made the recipe twice?  that would be 20 things from 2 of A and 4 of B.  This is the same as changing the recipe to make double.  It works if you halve things as well, or multiply by any number or fraction.

So the point is, we changed the amount of apples.  We want to know how much we changed it by, then that much is how much the total number of muffins changes.  So if we doubled apples the muffins would double, but I don't think it's that simple.

Started at 3/4 cup of chopped apple and increased to 9/8 cups.  We want to know what to multiiply by to do this.  So we set up a simple algebraic equation.

(3/4)x = 9/8

where x is what we multiply by.  Now, to do this you could do one step, divide by 3/4 or you could do it in two steps, multiply both sides by 4 then divide by 3.  Or the other way around.  Either way you will get the same number.

(3/4)x = 9/8

3x = 9/2

x = 3/2

And you can (and should) double check

(3/4)x = 9/8

(3/4)(3/2) = 9/8

9/8 = 9/8

Yay!  If you don't gt fraction multiplication let me know.  But the recipie is an increase of 3/2 or 1.5, so there will be 1.5 as many muffins.

12*1.5 = 12(3/2) = 18

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Pew Research Center reported that 73% of Americans who own a cell phone also use text messaging. In a recent local survey, 1
AnnZ [28]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.775 -0.73}{\sqrt{\frac{0.73(1-0.73)}{200}}}=1.433  

Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>1.433)=0.152  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:

Do Not reject H0

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=200 represent the sample size slected

X=155 represent the cell phone owners used text messaging

\hat p=\frac{155}{200}=0.775 estimated proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging

p_o=0.73 is the value to verify

\alpha=0.1 represent the significance level

We need to conduct a z test for a proportion

z would represent the statistic

p_v represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to verify if the true proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging is different from 0.73 so then the system of hypothesis are:

Null hypothesis:p=0.73  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.73  

The statistic to check this hypothesis is given by:

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

Replacing the data given we got:

z=\frac{0.775 -0.73}{\sqrt{\frac{0.73(1-0.73)}{200}}}=1.433  

Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>1.433)=0.152  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:

Do Not reject H0

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help! 3 Questions please show how you solved the problem
    15·1 answer
  • Each ticket to enter the zoo costs 7$ adam bought two bags of peanuts for 4$ and one of his brothers bought a lion poster for 12
    9·2 answers
  • Easy multiplication question ;)
    11·2 answers
  • Simplify 1/2√40<br> A) √10<br> B) 2√10<br> C) 4√10
    6·2 answers
  • 5/3v = 125/7<br> PLEASE HELP
    12·1 answer
  • Kyle has 130 pins in his collection he has 76 of the pens displayed on his wall the rest are in a drawer how many of Kyle’s pins
    9·1 answer
  • ILL GIVE BRANILESST PLZ
    15·2 answers
  • Bonus problem. Find the ratio a :b if it is given that 3a=8b​
    13·1 answer
  • Find the area of the composite area
    6·1 answer
  • Competitive firms that earn a loss in the short run should
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!