Answer:
Facial behavior has an innate, unlearned component.
Explanation:
The debate of nature vs. nurture is one of the most important ones in the social sciences. "Nature" states that some traits are innate to humans, and are already within us the moment we are born. On the other hand, "nurture" refers to the idea that it is society that teaches us some of our traits, and we adopt them based on our culture. What this research wants to show is that human facial behaviour has a component that is innate and unlearned.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
The correct answer is B. FALSE
Answer:
I can infer that the person in this story is a female, that she is doing a performance, and that she succeeds.
Explanation:
1.) I can infer that she is a female because it says, " SHE spins" and " leaving in HER wake"
2.)I can infer that she is doing a performance because it says, " she spins, through the air, lands on the mat, rolls, springs" These are things that gymnast do in their performances.
3) I can infer that she succeeds because it says," The thunder, of applause" People applause when someone does a good job in whatever they are doing
That's all, Hope it helps you!