The answer is the City Council
Answer:
Explanation:
Scientific knowledge changes over time? What does it change? Well know u will know. You will always have to be on guard because anything can change. Now with the food pyramid it is also important because you never know when it might add something to it, but it is important because that is at least everything you need every day. The Explosion in what we know about life form is important and change because we might have a plant we can’t touch or something like that.
Well we don’t want parents being shocked when your kid comes home from school and says dinosaurs have feathers you may think there lying until you have to look it up. Now let’s be for real dinosaurs don’t have feather well at least not now. According to half -life of facts there is a website called “up to date” that is constantly updating to real time. So then you will really know what is true and not. According to source one half-life of facts we seem to know more about the universe then we did a few decades ago. “it is not the case that just because knowledge is constantly being overturned doesn’t mean we do not know anything. “but there is a lot of people that don’t like change. That means it doesn’t hurt to look at Wikipedia more often.
That is not the only thing that is important about how scientific knowledge change over time it is also the food pyramid. It is important that u have your 4 colored sections, for fruit, vegetables, grains, and protein and sometime 5, dairy according to the food pyramid and why it changes. According to source 2 “several people who have been briefed on the change. Besides the plate is a smaller circle for dairy, suggesting a glass of low-fat milk, or perhaps a yogurt cup.” This change of the plate is meant to give consumers a fast, easily grasped reminder for the basics of a healthy diet. According to the food pyramid a version of the pyramid is currently appearing on cereal boxes, frozen dinners ETC... it is a strip of information about that food and many people have no idea what it represents.
We know that especially The Explosion in What We Know About Life Forms, is because there might be like a new plant we can’t touch because say it is potions or something. According to the life forms article people are wondering if scientist have found all the living species on earth yet. Well that answer they are trying to figure out themselves. According to source 3 the changes in the system of classification- called taxonomy- are making scientist believe there are far more species on earth then we ever expected. “The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle classified all living things as either plants or animals and further described animals as being of three types: those who live on land, lives in water, or those that live in air. According to life forms that have been some changes in the system as scientific learned more about organism. When scientific knowledge changes overtime, it can be to anything at anytime. The Explosion in what we know about life form is important and change because we might have a plant we can’t touch or something like that. That is not the only thing that is important about how scientific knowledge change over time it is also the food pyramid. We know that especially The Explosion in What We Know About Life Forms, is because there might be like a new plant we can’t touch because say it is potions or something. According to the life forms article people are wondering if scientist have found all the living species on earth yet.
Form a hypothesis
Step by step explanation
Put an end, often by force, to a group or an activity that is believed to threaten authority
person or thing that came before and influenced somebody/something else that is similar
Answer: your question is incomplete as you did not highlight the story. Please let me assume your questions to be this;
A story at ABCNews.com (“Pet Contact” by Rita Rubin, March 17, 1998) reported that Karen Allen, a researcher at the University of Buffalo, found that couples who own cats or dogs have more satisfying marriages and are less stressed out than those who don’t own pets. Pet owners also have more contact with each other and with other people. Allen compared 50 couples who owned either cats or dogs with 50 pet-free couples. The volunteers completed a standard questionnaire assessing their relationship and how attached they were to their pets. They also kept track of their social contacts over a 2-week period. To see how the couples responded to stress, Allen monitored their heart rates and blood pressure while they discussed sore subjects. Pet-owning couples started out with lower blood pressure readings than the others, and their numbers didn’t rise as much when they argued.
YOUR QUESTION:
describing a study about pet ownership and marriage. Explain whether each of the following is likely to be a problem for that study:
a. Confounding variables and the implication of causation in observational studies.
b. The Hawthorne effect and experimenter effects.
c. Lack of ecological validity and consequent generalization
YOUR ANSWER:
Option A is likely to be a problem for the study of pet ownership and marriage. Option A which is confounding variables and implication of causation in observational studies. Because this research is an observational study, of the relationship pet owners and non pet owners has in their marriage. The observational study has a confounding variable which is the pet, and the implication of causation is seen among married couples. The observational studies concluded that pet owners tends to have a low blood pressure reading and more body contact, than non pet owners. That means pet being the confounding variable has a positive effect on married couples.