1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
15

what were the changes and development made by the British when they shifted their capital from Calcutta to Delhi?.

History
1 answer:
ira [324]3 years ago
3 0

<em>Answer:</em>

Calcutta, the main centre of British Raj till then, had fallen out of favour as it had become politically unstable.

The British government wanted to shift the capital and Delhi won on many counts. It was closer to Shimla, the summer capital and was well connected by rail.

In the next 20 years, New Delhi would be carved out of scattered villages and a rocky ridge inhabited by jackals. The new capital and its imposing buildings would come to define Delhi for the next 100 years. The capital, however, would keep growing beyond the garden city planned by Edwin Lutyens - and continues to grow.

You might be interested in
Match each outcome with a weakness of the Articles of Confederation.
Masteriza [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Congress was not given any power to tax the people

No taxes=no money to run the country

2. Congress had no power to enforce its own laws in the states

No enforcement=people in various states doing what they want

3. Congress could not make states follow trade agreements with other nations

Bad trading relations with other counties = no international trade

4. Congress could not regulate trade between the states.

High trading taxes between states = difficulty trading goods = slow business = lost jobs

5. Citizens in states thought their property rights were being violated

Violated property rights = need for national government to check the states

6. There was no national court system

No national court system = different systems by state = confusion in the justice system Interstate issues would have no courts to go to on the federal level No means of checking the laws of the legislature

7. There was no executive branch for the central government

This means there was no President or party responsible for enforcing laws; no authority behind the laws There was no figure head for the government No means of checking the policies created by the legislature (what happens when all power is in one branch of government?)

8. It required a unanimous vote to make changes to the Articles

This made it very difficult to make any changes to the Articles

9. Many farmers lost their farms and homes; some were even put in prison As a result, local farmers, led by Daniel Shays decided to rebel by shutting down the courts using force - they even raided a federal arsenal to take weapons for their rebellion

The purpose of this meeting was "for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation"...but they ended up creating a new U.S. Constitution.

4 0
2 years ago
Hunger marches were organized by the?
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

The march is organized by the Washington State Hunger March Committee, and Communist Party members are prominent in the leadership

Explanation:

With unemployment at 2,750,000, the 1932 National Unemployed Workers' Movement organised "Great National Hunger March against the Means Test" included about 3,000 people in eighteen contingents of marchers, mainly from economically depressed areas such as the South Wales Valleys, Scotland and the North of England  

5 0
2 years ago
Why did England colonize north America and how did geography affect its settlement?​
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

Their climate helped them become the 'breadbasket' of British North America. Arable land was plentiful and the soil was fertile. The excellent natural harbors helped the middle colonies become traders among the colonies.

6 0
3 years ago
in what way does jefferson emphasize that the colonists complaints are against the king of england not against the british peopl
Leokris [45]
The main way in which Jefferson does this is to use the phrase "we the people" when writing the Declaration of Independence, since this can be meant to mean the people of the entire world. 
5 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP! I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST! Explain the similarities between the progressive era and now
Margaret [11]

Answer:

In the 21st century, progressives continue to embrace concepts such as environmentalism and social justice. While the modern progressive movement may be characterized as largely secular in nature, by comparison, the historical progressive movement was to a significant extent rooted in and energized by religion.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Two reasons why people supported the expansion of the United States’ territory?
    12·1 answer
  • When did Serbia and Montenegro split? And what, exactly, is Kosovo? Thank you.
    13·1 answer
  • General McClellan proved to be an incapable leader for the North for two reasons. What were they?
    14·2 answers
  • How did the music of the Harlem Renaissance celebrate African-American culture?
    15·1 answer
  • What does this political cartoon reveal about Germany's attitude toward signing the treaty of Versailles
    11·1 answer
  • The leader of the Bolsheviks was _____. Tolstoy Alexander Lenin Nicholas
    5·2 answers
  • What year did Thomas Edison invent the Phonograph?
    10·2 answers
  • Upon entering World War IIAmerican troops first invaded:
    15·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST FIVE STARS AND A HEART!
    5·1 answer
  • The Constitution requires the attendance of representatives in Congress. This provision was written to address what problem?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!