Why did the British attack New Orleans in 1815?

2 answers:

6 0

I think it’s two. The reason why is because you could transport materials downs the Mississippi River & the land is fertile.

Mademuasel [1]2 years ago

4 0

I think 1 or 2 because in 1812 British burnt down the white House. Which I'm guessing they wanted to tear down America and kill the president.

You might be interested in

The legacy of the League of Nations

KonstantinChe [14]

It was a idea made by President Woodrow Wilson to form a nation of sovereignty.

7 0

3 years ago

The academic study of religion and the theological study of religion:

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

D). are completely different from one another because while the theologian must be a believer in the tradition they study, the academic historical-critical scholar must be an atheist.

Explanation:

The key difference that exists between the theological study and academic study of religion is that theology lays emphasis on studying the nature of God or other supernatural forces and faith associated to it while academic study focuses upon critically examining a specific religious belief or behavior from an outlander's perspective.

Thus, the theologian is necessarily a believer as he/she aims to understand how the character of transcendental forces(implying they believe it) while 'the academic historical-critical scholar must be an atheist' as then only he would be able to do critical study without any bias. Thus, option D is the correct answer.

6 0

3 years ago

A generally accepted understanding of "comparative politics" is that it is a method of explaining similarities and differences b

ch4aika [34]

Answer:

Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model. Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such issues as politics of democratic and authoritarian states, political identity, regime change and democratization, voting behavior and a number of others.

Comparativists often ask how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.

Following the democratization example, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.

4 0

2 years ago

What indications do you have that the site is biased or not biased? list three things that appear to make this site biased or un

miskamm [114]

Here is information that will help you to answer this question on your own.

1) Author- Taking into consideration the author of the website is a way to determine bias. For example, if the website/article is created by a person who is a well known advocate for a specific political party, you can assume that they have a bias.

2) Sources- The sources that a website uses are critical to determine whether or not it is bias. If the website only cites other sources with a similar view, you can assume their is some bias.

3) Source of funding- If a website is sponsored by an organization, there is most likely bias. This is because without funding, many websites would not exist.

8 0

3 years ago

Central African Repbublic is one of the richest nations in Africa. True False

mars1129 [50]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Mauritius is the richest African nation and generally one of the best countries to live in Africa

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers