Answer:
a. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 20%)
= $10,800
b. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 40%)
= $8,100
From year 1 to year 2, the real GDP of the economy increases by 20%.
<h3>What is real GDP?</h3>
Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year.
Real GDP is GDP calculated using base year prices. Real GDP has been adjusted for inflation. It reflects the value of goods and services produced in an economy.
<h3>What is the increase in real GDP?</h3>
GDP in year 1 = 10 x $2 = 20
Real GDP in year 2 using year 1 prices as base price = 12 x $2 = $24
Increase in real GDP = (24 / 20) - 1 = 20%
To learn more about GDP, please check: brainly.com/question/15225458
Answer:
$40
Explanation:
The computation of the premium pay for the next year is shown below:
= Estimated medical bills × given percentage for next year
= $4,000 × 1 %
= $40
By multiplying the estimated value of medical bills with the next year given percentage, the premium for the next year can come
All other information that is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer: The amount of gross margin Mazer would report if the company uses absorption costing is $1350.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mazer Manufacturing Company produced = 2,000 units of inventory
Units Sold = 1,800 units
Variable product cost = $4 per unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost = $2,500
Sales price of the products = $6 per unit
Fixed manufacturing cost per unit = 
= 
= $1.25 per unit
Unit Product cost under Absorption costing = Variable product cost + Fixed manufacturing cost per unit
= 4 + 1.25
= $5.25
∴ Gross margin under Absorption costing = Sales Revenue - Cost of goods sold
= Units sold × sales price - Units sold × Unit Product cost under Absorption costing
= 1800 × 6 - 1800 × 5.25
= 10800 - 9450
= $1350
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- The strategy execution method offers a systematic framework to explain, interact, enforce, and conduct policy. The objective of this project would be to ensure that the organization focuses on building value-added technologies and implementing value-optimizing expenditures.
- Bringing together a good leadership people with the highest combination of talents, abilities, as well as the desire to do tasks has become one of the measures to follow to initiate this venture.
Other choices have no relation with the specified scenario. So Option C seems to be the right response.