Answer:
The correct answer is decrease; increase.
Explanation:
The "Buy American" law was passed in 1933 and established that the US federal government. UU. You must prioritize the purchase of products manufactured in the country. Under certain circumstances, however, the "Buy American" law may not apply when:
- material of American origin has an excessive cost;
- material of American origin is not available in sufficient quantity or volume;
- material of American origin is not in the public interest.
The "Buy American" law may also not apply if the president of the United States or a delegated authority said it on the grounds of reciprocal agreements with other countries defined in the Law on Trade Agreements, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization.
Answer:
$905,000
Explanation:
February Collection will be as follows :
<em>February Collection = Cash Sales + Credit Sales </em>
= $900,000 x 25 % + $900,000 x 40 % + $800,000 x 60 %
= $905,000
the amount of cash received from sales during the month of February is $905,000.
before the period begins
What is period progresses?
A Progress Payment may be provided for a period of time called a Progress Period that is both less than and included in the Performance Period. 2.22 "Target Reward" refers to the target award, as decided by the Committee in accordance with Section 3.3, payable under the Plan to a Participant for the Performance Period, expressed as a percentage of his or her Base Salary or as a specific monetary amount. 2.23 "Termination of Employment" refers to the end of the employee-employer relationship between an employee and the Company or an Affiliate for any reason, including, but not limited to, terminations due to resignation, discharge, death, disability, or retirement that take place in accordance with the rules that may from time to time be established by the Committee (at its discretion).
Learn more about period progresses with the help of given link:-
brainly.com/question/14759686
#SPJ4
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
