No; just because there is a correlation does not prove causation.
The correlation says that as the amount of rainfall increases, the amount of oranges produced increases as well. It does not state what causes it.
D?? mark crown if correct
Answer:
A) ERROR
B) ∠C = 26°
Step-by-step explanation:
Houston, We have a problem!!! too much information
If we had a legit triangle, the law of sines would hold
19/sin138 = 8/sin20
28.395 = 23.390
as this is NOT an equality, the triangle does not exist as described.
IF it did, we'd get different results depending on which set we used
∠F = 180 - 138 - 20 = 22°
Law of sines
19/sin138 = DE/sin22 ⇒ DE = 19sin22/sin138 = <u>10.63697...</u>
or
8/sin20 = DE/sin22 ⇒ DE = 8sin22/sin20 = <u>8.762211...</u>
If we attempt to use Law of cosines
DE² = 19² + 8² - 2(19)(8)cos22 = <u>11.9639...</u>
so really none is correct because we attempt to use trig calculations to a non-triangle.
12) AC² = 15² + 19² - 2(15)(19)cos120
AC = 29.51270...
29.51270 / sin120 = 15/sinC
C = arcsin(15sin120/29.51270) = 26.1142... <u>26°</u>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
