Answer:
Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
Explanation:
A basket of goods costs $800 in the US. The same basket costs 1,000 euros in France and 960 Australian dollars in Australia.  
The nominal exchange rate for euros is .80 euros per U.S. dollar and for Australian dollars, it is 1.2 Australian dollars per U.S. dollar.  
The purchasing power parity theory compares the currency of two countries through a basket of goods. The currency of the two countries is in equilibrium or is at par if a basket of goods cost the same in both the countries.  
This method compares the economic productivity and standard of living in two countries.  
Converting the value of basket in France into US dollars,
=  
= $1,250  
Converting the value of basket in Australia into US dollars,
=  
= $800
The cost of the basket of goods is same in Australia. This indicates that Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
 
        
             
        
        
        
D. All of the above
Omitting I, me, and my will make the resume more effective.
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Sorters and Farmworkers.
Explanation:
Not for sure if this is the answer, BUT it most likely is.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Hajj and Umrah packages which are not
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C. international strategy.
Explanation:
There are several business strategies been used different corporate to survive and grow in various business condition. 
International strategy is one of the business strategies that involve the adaptation of foreign policies and selling goods and services at the International market with some local customization to the product. When a firm pursues an international strategy, the head office of the firm retains fairly tight control over marketing and product strategy. Each subsidiary of the company, which is spread all over the world has independent operations with the least interference from the parent company. 
In the given case, Xerox had a monopoly on photocopier technologies as they are protected by strong patents, which is their international strategy.