Answer:
It was Miguel de Unamuno , spanish philosopher and writer who characterizedRizals execution as spanish disgrace and who , in 1970 was the first to call Rizal's the Tagalog Christmas.
Todo app for my iPad to use and the iPad version of answer is A
Incomplete question. But infer you are referring to this completed question;
Clarence invests $200 at the beginning of each quarter in stock ABC.
According to the table below, how many shares of ABC will Clarence own at the end of the year?(For each quarter, assume Clarence buys the maximum amount of stock that he can afford with his $200, and that he cannot buy fractions of stock).
ABC. Stock Price
Q1. $15
Q2. $16
Q3. $13
Q4. $18
Answer:
<u>51</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
Therefore, amount of share he gets is determine by the studio price for each quarter. (Note that we do not take account of decimals)
For Q1= 200/15= 13
For Q2= 200/16=12
For Q3= 200/13=15
For Q4= 200/18=11
Total=51. Thus, by summing up the number of ABC shares Clearence obtained in each quarter, at the end of the year he would have 51 shares.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
