Answer:
Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (enacted November 12, 1999) is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the bipartisan passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Job 765:
Direct material= $5,670
Direct labor= $3,500
Machine Hours= 27
Job 766:
Direct material= $8,900
Direct labor= $4,775
Machine Hours= 44
Job 765 produced 152 units, and Job 766 consisted of 250 units.
Assuming that the predetermined overhead rate is applied by using machine hours at a rate of $200 per hour.
Costs sheet:
<u>Job 765:</u>
Direct material= 5,670
Direct labor= 3,500
Allocated overhead= 200*27= 5,400
Total cost= 14,570
Unitary cost= 14,570/152= $95.85
<u>Job 766:</u>
Direct material= 8,900
Direct labor= 4,775
Allocated overhead= 200*44= 8,800
Total cost= 22,475
Unitary cost= 22,475/250= $89.9
Answer:
Sheridan Company journal entries:
June 10
- Dr Merchandise inventory 7,700
- Cr Accounts payable 7,700
June 11
- Dr Merchandise inventory 430
- Cr Cash 430
June 12
- Dr Accounts payable 800
- Cr Merchandise inventory 800
June 19
- Dr Accounts payable 6,900
- Cr Cash 6,693
- Cr Merchandise inventory 207
Available Options Are:
A. 401 units
B. 294 units
C. 441 units
D. 305 units
Answer:
Option C. 441 Units
Explanation:
The first thing would be to analyze the situation. It is crystal clear in the Accessibility Elite table that the accessibility of Digby products are 2nd largest among the rival companies.
Now we will look at whether the company has taken advantage of its second largest accessibility position or not. This can be seen in Actual Vs Potential Market Share table. The units produced were sold in the year which means that the accessibility of the product is even more than its rivals as the market share captured in the year by Digby is above 40%. This means that their is an increased demand for Digby's Product. This can also be seen by segment growth rate in the Elite Statistics (Top Left Corner) which is anticipated to be at 16%.
All these things says that Digby must produce as much as possible, hence quantity would be a greater number.
Answer:
$19.47
Explanation:
The computation of the price paid for share is shown below:
= Year second dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
where,
Next year dividend is
= $2.20 + $2.20 × 2.2%
= $2.20 + $0.0484
= $2.2484
In the year 2 , it is
= $2.2484 × 1.022
= $2.2978648
And, the required rate of return is 14%
Plus the growth rate is 2.2%
So, the price paid for the share is
= ( $2.2978648) ÷ (14% - 2.2%)
= $19.47
