Answer:
¥192/€1.00
Explanation:
In order to determine the cross rate, we need a formula such that the dollar sign in one exchange rate cancels the other dollar sign in the second exchange such that we are left with both Yen and the Euro as shown by the formula below:
S(€/¥) = S($/¥) / S($/€)
S($/¥) =$1/¥120
S($/€)=$1.60/ €1.00
S(€/¥) =($1/¥120)/($1.60/ €1.00)
if we change the division to multiplication we would have the below
S(€/¥) =$1/¥120*€1.00/$1.60
S(€/¥) =€0.005208333
This means that €0.005208333
=1¥
1¥/ €0.005208333=¥192
I think it is the return or benefits in other ways....
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Here, we want to select which of the given options in the question is true/correct.
From the question we can observe that the two bonds have required return less than coupon rate. Hence we can conclude that, both are premium bonds. The 7-years bond however. will have closer price to par value.
Bond prices will gradually decrease as we have a decrease in years to maturity. This means that the closer the year to maturity, the lesser the value of the bond price
Answer: Total Revenue is $100 and the price elasticity is 0.4
Explanation: total revenue is computed as Price * Quantity
$0.5 * 200= $100
Elasticity is the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.
Old price $1
New price $0.5
Old quantity 75
New quantity 200
Formula- % change in quantity demanded / % change in pride
NB change is (old-new)
Change in Qd= (75-200) / 75 =-1.67
Change in price=(1-0.5)/1=0.5
-1.67/0.5= -3.34
The negative is ignored in price elasticity and the answer is 3.34 which means the product is Elastic
Answer: <em>Option (C) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A recurrent conclusion of injuries occurred while falling is a long-term pain, medication for these are not taken in consideration among intermediate per-person costs of emergency cure for aged or old individuals's laceration from such falls</em>, if true, will have the tendency to seriously undermines conclusion of argument given in the comprehension.
This states that argument given in the comprehension has not taken in consideration cost for medicine which overall will increase cost. Thereby with an increase in cost the given statement will become untrue since the cost of surgery and medicine combined is higher than cost, in such a case treatment would be more economical. Therefore it undermines conclusion of argument.
